Cookaholics Bulletin Board

Cookaholics Bulletin Board

Shop, cook, eat, drink, post, repeat.
 
It is currently Sat Jun 15, 2024 4:00 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:52 am
Posts: 1140
Location: Kansas City
I think Amy gave you some very good advice - if you've llived this long wthout one, you probably don't need one.

However, they do make life easier and they do some amazing things in a very short time.
fitzie


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:37 pm
Posts: 3404
Location: Telluride, CO
jim262 wrote:
Even though you deny having interest in or a need for a stand mixer, It is clear that you are have Stage 3 G.A.S. [Gadget Acquisition Syndrome]. If you came here looking for a cure, you will be disappointed as we are all carriers and enablers. If we do our job well, you will be shopping for a mixer by the weekend. Congratulations.

*snicker*

fitzie wrote:
I think Amy gave you some very good advice - if you've llived this long wthout one, you probably don't need one.

For ONCE, I'm not being the enabler. :lol:

Amy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 1:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:51 am
Posts: 121
Amy wrote:
If you've lived this long without one, then you probably don't need one.

I also cherish the attachments. I grind all of my own beef and make sausages via the attachments.

I question whether anyone actually NEEDS one, but esp a home cook with low volume.
The attachments are worth considering, and I have looked that direction.
It's the only thing that makes me reconsider.

gardnercook wrote:
I love my stand mixer and I am just one (but mostly when I use it, it is when I am having guests). The thing I like most is that I can multitask....I don't have to stand there holding the hand mixer for five minutes...turn it on and go on to something else.
Ilene

You use yours mostly when the volume is there. That's what I'm talking about!
I have no problem creaming butter and sugar with the hand held. It goes pretty fast since I prep my sugar in the food processor first. Actually, it's kind of therapeutic, well - I find cooking in general is therapeutic, but then again so is washing the car. Yea, I'm weird.

jim262 wrote:
John,
Even though you deny having interest in or a need for a stand mixer, It is clear that you are have Stage 3 G.A.S. [Gadget Acquisition Syndrome]. If you came here looking for a cure, you will be disappointed as we are all carriers and enablers. If we do our job well, you will be shopping for a mixer by the weekend. Congratulations.

I'm not in denial,
I'm not in denial,
I'm not in denial . . .
Really, I am interested, otherwise I would not have posted the question. You bring up another point that I've been looking at myself about: The EGO of having another toy. But ego is a poor reason to justify getting an overgrown potato ricer. Yes, . . . I'm aware of the audience, and I fully anticipate 90% of you will encourage getting a stand mixer for several reasons.

One of those reasons may be very difficult for you to admit.

javafiend wrote:
Many recipes are written with the assumption you are using a stand mixer...hand mixers can take up to 50% longer to mix...as mentioned before, I can't imagine holding a hand mixer for very long

Based on what you said, you probably don't need the biggest, badass-est mixer on the market...just a good KA Artisan :mrgreen: you can probably shop around and get a good price, esp if you get a factory refurbished one


Point is well taken, however my favorite cookbook was handed down to me from my parents; first published in 1901. It doesn't mention stand mixers at all.

Cost is not an issue, although I will try to save a buck as well as the next guy. I have shopped a little, and I find there are great deals out there; the best so far is the KA 600 series 575 watt, two mixing bowls, a plastic shield for $270 total. It doesn't need to be a KA either, especially since their patent ran out. The industry is full of competitive products of a similar format for much less (Wolfgang Puck as example). It can be the duo beaters with revolving bowl (which I kind of like because it's easier to distribute ingredients)

I am surprised at the number of people who won't let anyone borrow their KA mixer.

_________________
Cooking is like Love;
It should be entered into with Abandon, or not at all


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:37 pm
Posts: 3404
Location: Telluride, CO
Tunaoue wrote:
I am surprised at the number of people who won't let anyone borrow their KA mixer.

You shouldn't be...KA's break surprisingly easily. I long for a Hobart (which I use exclusively at work), but until I can fork out those kind of $$s, I'll have to stick with my KA.

Amy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 2:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:51 am
Posts: 121
Amy wrote:
Tunaoue wrote:
I am surprised at the number of people who won't let anyone borrow their KA mixer.

You shouldn't be...KA's break surprisingly easily.

Amy


oh.

Well, there's another reason to stay away.

_________________
Cooking is like Love;
It should be entered into with Abandon, or not at all


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:27 pm
Posts: 526
Location: Finger Lakes Wine Country
If my memory serves, there are at least three serial mixer murderers here who are responsible for the premature death of as many as seven KitchenAid mixers. Yes, it does happen, but I do not believe that it happens to KA mixers with greater frequency than other brands or that it happens to KA mixers under less load than would kill the competition.

I do know that repairing any mixer other than KA requires dealing with a single national repair facility and paying for transportation even if the unit is under warranty. Parts for KA mixers are available and inexpensive if one is inclined to do the repairs and a national network of authorized repair stations still exists even though they are not not as numerous as they once were. KA may still be the best value and best choice out there.

_________________
Jim
Weights of Baking Ingredients


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:43 am
Posts: 1426
I have a Viking Stand Mixer that I bought from an authorized Viking Appliance repair shop. They are also an authorized Kitchen Aid Appliance repair shop. The man who sold me my Viking said it is very well built and I will probably never have to have it repaired. He then took me into the back of his shop and showed me rows and rows of KA stand mixers that were waiting to be repaired. Not all stand mixers are the same.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 2:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:45 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Ottawa, ON
Well, even though I essentially have the same mixer as the Viking (I'm one of the KA serial killers), in KA's defence they outsell Viking/Cusinart/etc by many orders of magnitude, so absolute volume at the repair shop is not indicative of their reliability, just their popularity.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:43 am
Posts: 1426
Paul Kierstead wrote:
Well, even though I essentially have the same mixer as the Viking (I'm one of the KA serial killers), in KA's defence they outsell Viking/Cusinart/etc by many orders of magnitude, so absolute volume at the repair shop is not indicative of their reliability, just their popularity.


True. I'm just going by what the man who repairs the machines said about the Vikings quality.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Questioning the need of a Stand Mixer
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:37 pm
Posts: 3404
Location: Telluride, CO
jim262 wrote:
If my memory serves, there are at least three serial mixer murderers here who are responsible for the premature death of as many as seven KitchenAid mixers.

Hey, I resemble that remark!

Yes, I've broken at least two KA's...oh wait, I broke the same KA twice, but it wasn't my fault. I swear!

Amy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Template made by DEVPPL/ThatBigForum