Amy wrote:
If you've lived this long without one, then you probably don't need one.
I also cherish the attachments. I grind all of my own beef and make sausages via the attachments.
I question whether anyone actually NEEDS one, but esp a home cook with low volume.
The attachments are worth considering, and I have looked that direction.
It's the only thing that makes me reconsider.
gardnercook wrote:
I love my stand mixer and I am just one (but mostly when I use it, it is when I am having guests). The thing I like most is that I can multitask....I don't have to stand there holding the hand mixer for five minutes...turn it on and go on to something else.
Ilene
You use yours mostly when the volume is there. That's what I'm talking about!
I have no problem creaming butter and sugar with the hand held. It goes pretty fast since I prep my sugar in the food processor first. Actually, it's kind of therapeutic, well - I find cooking in general is therapeutic, but then again so is washing the car. Yea, I'm weird.
jim262 wrote:
John,
Even though you deny having interest in or a need for a stand mixer, It is clear that you are have Stage 3 G.A.S. [Gadget Acquisition Syndrome]. If you came here looking for a cure, you will be disappointed as we are all carriers and enablers. If we do our job well, you will be shopping for a mixer by the weekend. Congratulations.
I'm not in denial,
I'm not in denial,
I'm not in denial . . .
Really, I am interested, otherwise I would not have posted the question. You bring up another point that I've been looking at myself about: The EGO of having another toy. But ego is a poor reason to justify getting an overgrown potato ricer. Yes, . . . I'm aware of the audience, and I fully anticipate 90% of you will encourage getting a stand mixer for several reasons.
One of those reasons may be very difficult for you to admit.
javafiend wrote:
Many recipes are written with the assumption you are using a stand mixer...hand mixers can take up to 50% longer to mix...as mentioned before, I can't imagine holding a hand mixer for very long
Based on what you said, you probably don't need the
biggest, badass-est mixer on the market...just a good KA Artisan
you can probably shop around and get a good price, esp if you get a factory refurbished one
Point is well taken, however my favorite cookbook was handed down to me from my parents; first published in 1901. It doesn't mention stand mixers at all.
Cost is not an issue, although I will try to save a buck as well as the next guy. I have shopped a little, and I find there are great deals out there; the best so far is the KA 600 series 575 watt, two mixing bowls, a plastic shield for $270 total. It doesn't need to be a KA either, especially since their patent ran out. The industry is full of competitive products of a similar format for much less (Wolfgang Puck as example). It can be the duo beaters with revolving bowl (which I kind of like because it's easier to distribute ingredients)
I am surprised at the number of people who won't let anyone borrow their KA mixer.