|
Author |
Message |
Kathy's Pete
|
Post subject: Spammer population Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:47 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:10 pm Posts: 1060 Location: PA
|
Looks like we've been discovered by the spammers. In the last week we've had 25 new members join (out of 80 members total on this board) most of them with 12-character cryptic names. I've helped Kathy ban a number of them from the board after they've posted spam, smut or other blatant misbehavioral posts.
It might be time to make it harder for people to sign up - at the minimum using a captcha (I suspect that some of the accounts were user-generated) or requiring more Admin or Moderator approval of new members. The Mod workload over the last week is more than it would have been if they had had to individually approve each of the legitimate members.
Fuzzy: I'll look around to see what phpBB tools are available to fight the spam.
Pete
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Kathy's Pete
|
Post subject: Re: Spammer population Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:53 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:10 pm Posts: 1060 Location: PA
|
Looks like here's a start ( WARNING: Contains computerspeak and technical info. Probably only useful for Fuzzy): Preventing Spam in PHP 3.0Asirra "Human Interactive Proof" tool from Microsoft (Looks like it's a Beta). User identifies which of ten random photos are cats and which are dogs. Easy for humans, hard for bots. Requires JavaScript on the User's browser at registration; probably no big deal to expect that. Apparently Custom Profile Fields in the signup page are simple and effective, if not as much fun as looking at cats & dogs.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Da Bull Man
|
Post subject: Re: Spammer population Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:43 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:21 am Posts: 1403 Location: Six Shooter Junction, Texas
|
I agree that it might be best that members pass the smell test prior to approval, at least until this wave of spammers has past. Boy...that last one was a doozy.. 
_________________ To do is to be [Descartes] To be is to do [Voltaire] Do be do be do [Sinatra].
|
|
Top |
|
 |
ntsc
|
Post subject: Re: Spammer population Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:32 am |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:47 pm Posts: 104 Location: New York outside NYC
|
And I haven't seen any of the good ones. I deleted about 20 posts yesterday morning. I think we are up to about 8 banned users so far.
I would imagine that PHP includes a user approval process but an admin needs to turn it on, at least I haven't found anything yet as a mod.
_________________ I also post elsewhere as Charcuteire (with misspelling) and have a blog under that name.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
wino
|
Post subject: Re: Spammer population Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:49 am |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:35 am Posts: 2305 Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
I didn't see what Da Bull Man was referring to either... If we bring in new regulations, I hope I make the cut  P.S. Do think it's actually Fuzzy behind all of these and he's just testing us to see if can actually take a real holiday????????
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Da Bull Man
|
Post subject: Re: Spammer population Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:38 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:21 am Posts: 1403 Location: Six Shooter Junction, Texas
|
_________________ To do is to be [Descartes] To be is to do [Voltaire] Do be do be do [Sinatra].
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Kathy's Pete
|
Post subject: Re: Spammer population Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:46 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:10 pm Posts: 1060 Location: PA
|
Most of the ones I've seen are a link with a line and a half of random text from somewhere.
Kathy showed me one yesterrday that was a paragraph of pure porn. I read about two lines of it and told her to ban the poster immediately. I never did finish reading it (sniff...).
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Kathy's Pete
|
Post subject: Re: Spammer population Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:48 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:10 pm Posts: 1060 Location: PA
|
wino wrote: P.S. Do think it's actually Fuzzy behind all of these and he's just testing us to see if can actually take a real holiday???????? Ha! I see I'm not the only one who has thought of that.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
JesBelle
|
Post subject: Re: Spammer population Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:02 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 7:50 pm Posts: 2062
|
Hmm, you think Fuzzy wrote the porn himself, or did he just find it on the web? How was the spelling?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Da Bull Man
|
Post subject: Re: Spammer population Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:27 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:21 am Posts: 1403 Location: Six Shooter Junction, Texas
|
JesBelle wrote: Hmm, you think Fuzzy wrote the porn himself, or did he just find it on the web? How was the spelling? Spelling??? You mean there were words??? Pete??? You saw words???...How bout that... 
_________________ To do is to be [Descartes] To be is to do [Voltaire] Do be do be do [Sinatra].
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|