|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
BeckyH
|
Post subject: CK in the NYT Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:38 am |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 5:03 pm Posts: 1149
|
Mr. Kimball wrote a very nice piece in the NYTimes the other day about the demise of Gourmet. clickety
|
|
Top |
|
 |
wino
|
Post subject: Re: CK in the NYT Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:25 am |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:35 am Posts: 2305 Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
Thanks for the link. This is an excellent article. It is well written, provides a brief historical overview of what made Gourmet distinct and what led to its demise, and it shines a light upon the challenges facing the publishing industry, specifically, and all subjects, generally, given the growth of the internet.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Kathy's Pete
|
Post subject: Re: CK in the NYT Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:19 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:10 pm Posts: 1060 Location: PA
|
It certainly explains his disdain for the Bulletin Board: Quote: The shuttering of Gourmet reminds us that in a click-or-die advertising marketplace, one ruled by a million instant pundits, where an anonymous Twitter comment might be seen to pack more resonance and useful content than an article that reflects a lifetime of experience, experts are not created from the top down but from the bottom up. They can no longer be coronated; their voices have to be deemed essential to the lives of their customers. That leaves, I think, little room for the thoughtful, considered editorial with which Gourmet delighted its readers for almost seven decades.
To survive, those of us who believe that inexperience rarely leads to wisdom need to swim against the tide, better define our brands, prove our worth, ask to be paid for what we do, and refuse to climb aboard this ship of fools, the one where everyone has an equal voice. Google “broccoli casserole” and make the first recipe you find. I guarantee it will be disappointing. The world needs fewer opinions and more thoughtful expertise...
|
|
Top |
|
 |
JesBelle
|
Post subject: Re: CK in the NYT Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:14 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 7:50 pm Posts: 2062
|
|
Top |
|
 |
marygott
|
Post subject: Re: CK in the NYT Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:24 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:34 pm Posts: 2011
|
Why can't we have thoughtful expertise and opinion? The 2nd broccoli casserole could be a winner.
Mary
|
|
Top |
|
 |
easy bake
|
Post subject: Re: CK in the NYT Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:31 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:38 pm Posts: 536
|
I thought the first one seemed fine. Bread crumbs (or Ritz crackers), guryere cheese, etc.
Thanks for posting the entire NYT article. Reading a snippet of it did not do it justice.
eb
|
|
Top |
|
 |
TheFuzzy
|
Post subject: Re: CK in the NYT Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:56 pm |
|
 |
Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:03 am Posts: 5280 Location: Portland, OR
|
Wow.
This does tell us that killing off the CI bulletin board was not an accident of neglect. It was policy.
_________________ The Fuzzy Chef Serious Chef iz Serious!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
talanhart
|
Post subject: Re: CK in the NYT Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:28 am |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:43 am Posts: 1427
|
JesBelle wrote: There was some interesting comments here. Thanks for posting.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Da Bull Man
|
Post subject: Re: CK in the NYT Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:56 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:21 am Posts: 1403 Location: Six Shooter Junction, Texas
|
WOW!!! When I posted that: "The board still has a handful of really, really nice people, but in large has been take over by elitist, snipping, shallow, people that quite frankly, I really have no use for." I had no idea that I was talking about the head cheese... 
_________________ To do is to be [Descartes] To be is to do [Voltaire] Do be do be do [Sinatra].
|
|
Top |
|
 |
saute
|
Post subject: Re: CK in the NYT Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:16 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:43 pm Posts: 55 Location: Houston TX
|
talanhart wrote: JesBelle wrote: There was some interesting comments here. Thanks for posting. "Kimball is correct that he should be better defining his brand and proving his worth -- that's what we've been saying all along. But you can do that without insulting the riff raff, as well. You can do that while embracing the "bottom up" process. You can do that without being a total snob that has no time for the people who actually pay your salary." :golfclap: And may I say, I have enjoyed my last "Vermont Tales by the Out of Touch" email.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|